Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets
Cite as
-
Vollständiger Titel
MONDI MIGRANTI
-
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
1972-4888 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
1972-4896 (Online-Zeitschrift)
-
Nummer der Ausgabe
2
-
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
2
-
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe
2024
-
Vollständiger Titel
The regularisation industry: a qualitative analysis of the legal-administrative intermediation field
-
Von (Autor)
-
Erste Seite
85
-
Letzte Seite
107
-
Sprache des Textes
Englisch
-
Erscheinungsdatum
2024/08
-
Copyright
2024FrancoAngeli srl
Abstract/Hauptbeschreibung
The bureaucratic management of the legal and administrative statuses of mi-grants is a pervasive yet scarcely researched aspect of the migratory experi-ence. This article describes the field of intermediation services for migrants, with a particular focus on legal and bureaucratic support. Using the 2020 regu-larization of irregular migrant workers in Italy as a case study, it shows that actors related to this emerging segment of the ‘migration industry' are not only concerned with facilitating migrants' physical border crossings but also that intermediation services increasingly involve the crossing of internal borders, particularly between different (il)legal migration statuses. The article describes the field of legal-administrative status-intermediation, highlighting the different actors involved, who differ widely in their legal competency and the degree to which they marketize their services. The article argues that the com-bination of legal uncertainty and the specific features of the institutional and regulatory framework concerning intermediation services in Italy creates space for the emergence and expansion of for-profit actors. These actors oper-ate on a sliding scale between legal and illegal, formal and informal service-provision, ranging from commercial intermediation to illicit practices and fraud. Additionally, the article shows increasing forms of competition and ten-sion between non-profit and for-profit actors in the field. The analysis is based on 45 interviews with different actors of civil society, employers and migrants involved in the amnesty. The article looks at the migration industry as a field of intermediation in a context marked by the pandemic and on the forms of embeddedness of irregular migrants in local society.
Zitierungen des
10.3280/MM2024-002004
Unstructured Zitierung
Ambrosini M. (2015). From “illegality” to Tolerance and Beyond: Irregular Immigration as a Selective and Dynamic Process. International Migration, 54, 2: 144-159;
Unstructured Zitierung
Bonizzoni P. and Dotsey S. (2023). Migration and Legal Precarity in the Time of Pandemic: Qualitative Research on the Italian Case. DVE DOMOVINI, 54: 117-130.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bonizzoni P. and Hajer M.H.J. (2023a). Civil Society Actors and the 2020 Italian Amnesty: Bordering to Deborder? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 44, 1: 44-60.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bonizzoni P. and Hajer M.H.J. (2023b). Politicising the Amnesty: Struggles for Migrants’ Legality during a Pandemic. Partecipazione e conflitto, 16, 1: 119-137.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bonizzoni P. and Odasso L. (2024). Legal-Administrative Intermediation in the Migration Field. An Introduction. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 17, 2: 195-211.
Unstructured Zitierung
Brambilla C. (2015). Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics, 20, 1: 14-34.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bendixsen S. (2018). Differentiation of rights in the Norwegian welfare state: Hierarchies of belonging and humanitarian exceptionalism. Social Inclusion, 6, 3: 162-171.
Unstructured Zitierung
Calavita K. (2005). Immigrants at the Margins: Law, Race, and Exclusion in Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Collyer M. and de Haas H. (2012). Developing dynamic categorisations of transit migration: Categorisations of transit migration. Population, Space and Place, 18, 4: 468-481.
Unstructured Zitierung
Conlon D. (2011). Waiting: Feminist Perspectives on the Spacings/Timings of Migrant (Im)Mobility, Gender, Place and Culture, 18, 3: 353-360.
Unstructured Zitierung
Cranston S., Schapendonk J. and Spaan E. (2018). New directions in exploring the migration industries: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 543-557.
Unstructured Zitierung
Crawley H. and Skleparis D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 1: 48-64.
Unstructured Zitierung
De Blasis F. and Bonizzoni P. (2024). High Stakes and Hidden Traps. Migration Industry, Risks of Deception, and Legal Status Precarity in the Lottery of the Decreto Flussi. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 17, 2: 237-262.
Unstructured Zitierung
De Haas H., Natter K. and Vezzoli S. (2018). Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies. International Migration Review, 52, 2: 324-367.
Unstructured Zitierung
Dimitriadis I. (2018). Asking around”: immigrants' counterstrategies to renew their residence permit in times of economic crisis in Italy. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16, 3: 275-292.
Unstructured Zitierung
El-Kayed N. and Hamann U. (2018). Refugees’ access to housing and residency in German cities: Internal border regimes and their local variations. Social Inclusion, 6, 1: 135-146.
Unstructured Zitierung
Engbersen G. and Broeders D. (2009). The State Versus the Alien: Immigration Control and Strategies of Irregular Immigrants. West European Politics, 32, 5: 867-885.
Unstructured Zitierung
Engbersen G., Van San M. and Leerkes A. (2006). A Room with a View. Irregular Immigrants in the Legal Capital of the World. Ethnography, 7, 2: 205-238.
Unstructured Zitierung
Esaiasson P., Lajevardi N. and Sohlberg J. (2022). Reject, limbo, and accept: the effect of migration decisions on asylum seekers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48, 15: 3469-3483.
Unstructured Zitierung
Faist T. (2014). Brokerage in Cross-Border Mobility: Social Mechanisms and the (Re)Production of Social Inequalities. Social Inclusion, 2, 4: 38-52.
Unstructured Zitierung
Gammeltoft-Hansen T. and Nyberg-Sørensen N. (2013). The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration. New York: Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Garapich M. (2008). The Migration Industry and Civil Society: Polish Immigrants in the United Kingdom Before and After EU Enlargement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 5: 735-752.
Unstructured Zitierung
Goldring L. (2022). Precarious legal status trajectories as method, and the work of legal status. Citizenship Studies, 26, 4-5: 460-470.
Unstructured Zitierung
Goss J. and Lindquist B. (1995). Conceptualising International Labour Migration: A Structuration Perspective. International Migration Review, 29, 2: 317-351.
Unstructured Zitierung
Groutsis D., van den Broek D. and Harvey W. (2015). Transformations in Network Governance: The Case of Migration Intermediaries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, 10: 1558-1576.
Unstructured Zitierung
Guentner S., Lukes S., Stanton R., Vollmer B.A. and Wilding J. (2016). Bordering practices in the UK welfare system. Critical Social Policy, 36, 3: 391-411.
Unstructured Zitierung
Harvey W.S., Groutsis, D. and van den Broek D. (2018). Intermediaries and Destination Reputations: Explaining Flows of Skilled Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 644-662.
Unstructured Zitierung
Hernández León R. (2013). Conceptualizing the Migration Industry. In: Gammeltoft-Hansen T. and Nyberg Sorenson N., eds., The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration (pp. 24-44). Oxford: Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Hernández León R. (2008). Metropolitan Migrants: The Migration of Urban Mexicans to the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Kolossov V. and Scott J. (2013). Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, 1: 1-19.
Unstructured Zitierung
Könönen J. (2018). Border struggles within the state: Administrative bordering of non-citizens in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8, 3: 143-150;
Unstructured Zitierung
Ibrido R., Cerrina Feroni G. and Federico V. (2021). Governing through uncertainty? Migration law and governance in a comparative perspective. DPCE Online, 45, 4: 5130-5135.
Unstructured Zitierung
Infantino F. (2023). The interdependency of border bureaucracies and mobility intermediaries: a street-level view of migration infrastructuring. Comparative Migration Studies, 11: 1;
Unstructured Zitierung
Lindquist J. (2010). Labour Recruitment, Circuits of Capital and Gendered Mobility: Reconceptualizing the Indonesian Migration Industry. Pacifica Affairs, 83, 1: 115-132.
Unstructured Zitierung
Lindquist J., Xiang B. and Yeoh B. (2012). Opening the Black Box of Migration, Brokers, the Organization of Transnational Mobility and the Changing Political Economy in Asia. Pacific Affairs, 85, 1: 7-19.
Unstructured Zitierung
Mau S. (2012). Liberal states and the freedom of movement: Selective borders, unequal mobility. Palgrave Macmillan.
Unstructured Zitierung
Montagna N. (2021). Libia-Italia: la rotta del Mediterraneo centrale e l’industria della migrazione. In: Colombo M., ed., CIRMiB, MigraReport 2021 (pp. 107-122). Milano: Vita&Pensiero.
Unstructured Zitierung
Morris L. (2002). Managing migration: Civic stratification and migrants’ rights. London: Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Nyberg-Sørensen N. (2012). Revisiting the Migration–Development Nexus: From Social Networks and Remittances to Markets for Migration Control. International Migration, 50, 3: 61-76.
Unstructured Zitierung
Nyberg-Sørensen N. and Gammeltoft-Hansen T. (2013). Introduction. In: Nyberg-Sørensen N. and Gammeltoft-Hansen T., eds., The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration (pp. 1-24). London: Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Odasso L. (2021). Negotiating legitimacy: Binational couples in the face of immigration bureaucracy in Belgium and Italy. Anthropologica, 63, 1: 1-30.
Unstructured Zitierung
Pallister-Wilkins P. (2018). Médecins Avec Frontières and the making of a humanitarian borderscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36, 1: 114-138.
Unstructured Zitierung
Pannia P. (2021). “Institutional uncertainty” as a technique of migration governance. A Comparative Legal Perspective. DPCE Online, 45, 4: 5136-5157.
Unstructured Zitierung
Paul R. (2015). The political economy of border drawing: Arranging legality in European labor migration policies. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Unstructured Zitierung
Salt J. and Stein J. (1997). Migration as a Business: The Case of Trafficking. International Migration, 35, 4: 467-494.
Unstructured Zitierung
Schapendonk J. and Steel G. (2014). Following Migrant Trajectories: The Im/Mobility of Sub-Saharan Africans en Route to the European Union. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 2: 262-270.
Unstructured Zitierung
Schuster L. (2005). The Continuing Mobility of Migrants in Italy: Shifting between Places and Statuses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 4: 757-774.
Unstructured Zitierung
Spaan E. (1999). Labour Circulation and Socioeconomic Transformation: The Case of East Java, Indonesia. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
Unstructured Zitierung
Spaan E. (1994). Taikongs and Calos: The Role of Middlemen and Brokers in Javanese International Migration. International Migration Review, 28, 1: 93-113.
Unstructured Zitierung
Spaan E. and Hillmann F. (2013). Migration Trajectories and the Migration Industry: Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Examples from Asia. In: Gammeltoft-Hansen T. and Nyberg Sorensen N., eds., The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration (pp. 64-86). Abingdon: Routledge.
Unstructured Zitierung
Spener D. (2009). Some Critical Reflections on the Migration Industry Concept. Accessed March 1, 2024; http://www.trinity.edu/dspener/clandestinecrossings/related%20articles/migration%20industry.pdf/.
Unstructured Zitierung
Spener D. (2004). Mexican Migrant-Smuggling: A Cross-Border Cottage Industry. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 5, 3: 295-320.
Unstructured Zitierung
Schweitzer R. (2022). Managing irregularity through the provision of social assistance. In: Micro-management of irregular migration: Internal borders and public services in London and Barcelona (pp. 155-188). Springer.
Unstructured Zitierung
Xiang B. and Lindquist J. (2014). Migration Infrastructure. International Migration Review, 48, S1: S122-S148.
Unstructured Zitierung
Triandafyllidou A. and Ambrosini M. (2011). Irregular immigration control in Italy and Greece: Strong fencing and weak gate-keeping serving the labour market. European Journal of Migration and Law, 13, 3: 251-273.
Unstructured Zitierung
Tuckett A. (2018). Ethical brokerage and self-fashioning in Italian immigration bureaucracy. Critique of Anthropology, 38, 3: 245-264.
Unstructured Zitierung
Tuckett A. (2015). Strategies of navigation: migrants' everyday encounters with Italian immigration bureaucracy. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33, 1: 113-128.
Unstructured Zitierung
Van Houtum H. and Van Naerssen T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93, 2: 125-136.
Unstructured Zitierung
Yuval-Davis N., Wemyss G. and Cassidy K. (2019). Bordering. Cambridge: Polity Press.