Anzeige des vollständigen DOI-Metadaten-Sets
Cite as
-
Vollständiger Titel
SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
-
Verlag
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0392-5048 (Gedruckte Zeitschrift)
1972-554X (Online-Zeitschrift)
-
Nummer der Ausgabe
154
-
Andere Beschreibung der Ausgabe
154
-
Erscheinungsdatum der Ausgabe (YYYY/MM)
2019/09
-
Vollständiger Titel
When the law is not enough. Caseworkers' ideas of justice in practices
-
Von (Autor)
-
Erste Seite
163
-
Letzte Seite
182
-
Sprache des Textes
Englisch
-
Erscheinungsdatum
2019/09
-
Copyright
2019 FrancoAngeli srl
Vorwort
Drawing from Lipsky's (1980) concept of street-level bureaucracy and the theories of justice (Rawls, 1971; Mashaw, 1983; Elster, 1992), this paper is focused on the dilemmas that social welfare services' caseworkers face in their daily work. The field research is based on the collection and comparison of caseworkers' narratives about complex cases. It was conducted within services located in the North and South of Europe: Bologna in Central Italy and Copenhagen in Denmark. Social work practices are analysed through caseworkers' narratives to understand how their ideas influence the services. This study is intended to answer the following research questions: What challenges do caseworkers have to cope with? How do they manage their discretion to shape ‘fair' decisions? What conditions and limits contribute to shaping the services' final decisions? What principles of justice regulate the processing of cases, and thus what concrete ideas of social justice underpin the services?
Zitierungen des
10.3280/SL2019-154009
Unstructured Zitierung
Beckman S. (1990). Professionalisation: borderline authority and autonomy of work. In: Burrage M., Torstendahl R., eds., Professions in theory and history. London: Sage Pubblications.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bradley G. (2003). Administrative justice and charging for long term care. British Journal of Social Work, 33: 641-657.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.5.641
Unstructured Zitierung
Brodkin E.Z. (2011). Putting Street-Level Organizations First: New Directions for Social Policy and Management Research. Introduction.
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (2): 199-277.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq094
Unstructured Zitierung
Brodkin E.Z., Martson G. (2013). Work and the Welfare State. Street-Level Organisation and Workfare Politics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Bruner J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019
Unstructured Zitierung
Byman A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Denzin N., Lincoln Y. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. London: SAGE.
Unstructured Zitierung
Dubois V. (2010). The Bureaucrat and the Poor. Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Unstructured Zitierung
Dworkin R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
Unstructured Zitierung
Elster J. (1992). Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Unstructured Zitierung
Esping-Andersen G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Evans T. (2013). Organisational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work. British Journal of Social Work, 43 (4): 739-758.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs008
Unstructured Zitierung
Evans T., Harris J. (2004). Street-level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal
of Social Work, 34 (6): 871-895.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch106
Unstructured Zitierung
Ferrera M. (1993). Modelli di solidarietà. Politica e riforme sociali nelle democrazie. Bologna: il Mulino.
Unstructured Zitierung
Gearey A. (2012). Justice as welfare. Equity and Solidarity. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Unstructured Zitierung
Ham C., Hill M. (1984). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Brighton: Harverster Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Hill H.G. (2003). Understanding Implementation: Street-level Bureaucrats’ Resources for Reform. Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory, 13 (3): 265-282.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug024
Unstructured Zitierung
Hughes H., Williamson K., Lloyd A. (2007). Critical incident technique. In: Lipu S., ed., Exploring methods in information literacy research. Topics in Australasian Library and Information Studies. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Infromation Studies, Charles Sturt University.
Unstructured Zitierung
Hupe P., Hill M., Buffat A. (2015). Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313267.001.0001
Unstructured Zitierung
Kazepov Y., ed. (2010). Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe. Burlington: Ashgate.
Unstructured Zitierung
Kazepov Y., Barberis E. (2012). Social assistance governance in Europe. Towards a multi-level perspective. In: Marx I., Nelson
K., eds., Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291844_9
Unstructured Zitierung
Kelly M. (1994). Theories of Justice and Street-Level Discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 4 (2): 119-140.
Unstructured Zitierung
Kennet P., ed. (2004). A Handbook on Comparative Social Policy. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar.
Unstructured Zitierung
Lipsky M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305
Unstructured Zitierung
Mashaw J.L. (1983). Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Mau S., Veghte B., eds. (2007). Social Justice, Legitimacy, and the Welfare State. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Unstructured Zitierung
Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory, 10 (2): 329-358.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
Unstructured Zitierung
Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M. (2003). Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11924
Unstructured Zitierung
Meyers M.K., Vorsanger S. (2003). Street-Level Bureaucracy and Implementation of Public Policy. In: Peters B.G., Pierre J., eds., Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
Unstructured Zitierung
Musheno M., Maynard-Moody S. (2015). ‘Playing the rules’: discretion in social and policy context. In: Hupe P., Hill M., Buffat
A., eds., Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313267.003.0010
Unstructured Zitierung
Nothdurfter U., Hermans K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street-level research in public
management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3): 294-304.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12308
Unstructured Zitierung
Plant R., Lesser H., Taylor-Gooby P. (1980). Political Philosophy and Social Welfare. Essays on the normative basis of welfare provision. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Unstructured Zitierung
Powell M., Johns N., Green A. (2011). Social Justice in Social Policy. -- www.social-policy.org.uk/lincoln2011/PowellJohnsGreen%20P7.pdf.
Unstructured Zitierung
Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Rice D. (2012). Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State: toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation.
Administration & Society, 45(9): 1038-1062.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712451895
Unstructured Zitierung
Richards L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: SAGE.
Unstructured Zitierung
Riessman C.K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: SAGE.
Unstructured Zitierung
Rummery C., Glendinning C. (2000). Access to services as a civil and social rights issue: The role of welfare professionals
in regulating access to and commissioning services for disabled and older people under New Labour. Social Policy and Administration,
34(5): 529-550.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00209
Unstructured Zitierung
Saruis T. (2015). Gli operatori sociali nel nuovo welfare. Roma: Carocci.
Unstructured Zitierung
van Oorschot W. (2000). Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among
the Public. Policy and Politics, 28 (1): 33-49.
https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500811
Unstructured Zitierung
Watkins-Hayes C. (2011). Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies. Journal
of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21: 233-251.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096
Unstructured Zitierung
Weber M. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner’s.
Unstructured Zitierung
Wenger E. (2000). Comunità di pratica e sistemi sociali di apprendimento. Studi organizzativi, 1: 11-33.
Unstructured Zitierung
Wilkins V.M., Wenger J.F. (2015). Street-level bureaucrats and client interaction in a just world. In: Hupe P., Hill M., Buffat A., eds., Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Unstructured Zitierung
Woolsey L.K. (1986). The Critical Incident Technique: An Innovative Qualitative Method of Research. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 20 (4): 242-254.