Vedi metadata
Cite as
-
Titolo completo
SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
-
Editore
FrancoAngeli
-
ISSN
0392-5048 (Rivista Stampata)
1972-554X (Rivista Online)
-
Numero del fascicolo
154
-
Designazione del fascicolo
154
-
Data del fascicolo (YYYY/MM)
2019/09
-
Titolo completo
When the law is not enough. Caseworkers' ideas of justice in practices
-
Di (autore)
-
Prima Pagina
163
-
Ultima Pagina
182
-
Lingua del testo
Inglese
-
Data di publicazione
2019/09
-
Copyright
2019 FrancoAngeli srl
Introduzione o prefazione
Drawing from Lipsky's (1980) concept of street-level bureaucracy and the theories of justice (Rawls, 1971; Mashaw, 1983; Elster, 1992), this paper is focused on the dilemmas that social welfare services' caseworkers face in their daily work. The field research is based on the collection and comparison of caseworkers' narratives about complex cases. It was conducted within services located in the North and South of Europe: Bologna in Central Italy and Copenhagen in Denmark. Social work practices are analysed through caseworkers' narratives to understand how their ideas influence the services. This study is intended to answer the following research questions: What challenges do caseworkers have to cope with? How do they manage their discretion to shape ‘fair' decisions? What conditions and limits contribute to shaping the services' final decisions? What principles of justice regulate the processing of cases, and thus what concrete ideas of social justice underpin the services?
Elenco citazioni del
10.3280/SL2019-154009
Citazione non strutturata
Beckman S. (1990). Professionalisation: borderline authority and autonomy of work. In: Burrage M., Torstendahl R., eds., Professions in theory and history. London: Sage Pubblications.
Citazione non strutturata
Bradley G. (2003). Administrative justice and charging for long term care. British Journal of Social Work, 33: 641-657.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.5.641
Citazione non strutturata
Brodkin E.Z. (2011). Putting Street-Level Organizations First: New Directions for Social Policy and Management Research. Introduction.
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 (2): 199-277.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq094
Citazione non strutturata
Brodkin E.Z., Martson G. (2013). Work and the Welfare State. Street-Level Organisation and Workfare Politics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Bruner J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019
Citazione non strutturata
Byman A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Denzin N., Lincoln Y. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues. London: SAGE.
Citazione non strutturata
Dubois V. (2010). The Bureaucrat and the Poor. Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Citazione non strutturata
Dworkin R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.
Citazione non strutturata
Elster J. (1992). Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Citazione non strutturata
Esping-Andersen G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Evans T. (2013). Organisational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work. British Journal of Social Work, 43 (4): 739-758.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs008
Citazione non strutturata
Evans T., Harris J. (2004). Street-level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal
of Social Work, 34 (6): 871-895.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch106
Citazione non strutturata
Ferrera M. (1993). Modelli di solidarietà. Politica e riforme sociali nelle democrazie. Bologna: il Mulino.
Citazione non strutturata
Gearey A. (2012). Justice as welfare. Equity and Solidarity. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Citazione non strutturata
Ham C., Hill M. (1984). The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State. Brighton: Harverster Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Hill H.G. (2003). Understanding Implementation: Street-level Bureaucrats’ Resources for Reform. Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory, 13 (3): 265-282.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug024
Citazione non strutturata
Hughes H., Williamson K., Lloyd A. (2007). Critical incident technique. In: Lipu S., ed., Exploring methods in information literacy research. Topics in Australasian Library and Information Studies. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Infromation Studies, Charles Sturt University.
Citazione non strutturata
Hupe P., Hill M., Buffat A. (2015). Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313267.001.0001
Citazione non strutturata
Kazepov Y., ed. (2010). Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe. Burlington: Ashgate.
Citazione non strutturata
Kazepov Y., Barberis E. (2012). Social assistance governance in Europe. Towards a multi-level perspective. In: Marx I., Nelson
K., eds., Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291844_9
Citazione non strutturata
Kelly M. (1994). Theories of Justice and Street-Level Discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 4 (2): 119-140.
Citazione non strutturata
Kennet P., ed. (2004). A Handbook on Comparative Social Policy. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA USA: Edward Elgar.
Citazione non strutturata
Lipsky M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305
Citazione non strutturata
Mashaw J.L. (1983). Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Mau S., Veghte B., eds. (2007). Social Justice, Legitimacy, and the Welfare State. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Citazione non strutturata
Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory, 10 (2): 329-358.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
Citazione non strutturata
Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M. (2003). Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11924
Citazione non strutturata
Meyers M.K., Vorsanger S. (2003). Street-Level Bureaucracy and Implementation of Public Policy. In: Peters B.G., Pierre J., eds., Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
Citazione non strutturata
Musheno M., Maynard-Moody S. (2015). ‘Playing the rules’: discretion in social and policy context. In: Hupe P., Hill M., Buffat
A., eds., Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313267.003.0010
Citazione non strutturata
Nothdurfter U., Hermans K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street-level research in public
management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3): 294-304.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12308
Citazione non strutturata
Plant R., Lesser H., Taylor-Gooby P. (1980). Political Philosophy and Social Welfare. Essays on the normative basis of welfare provision. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Citazione non strutturata
Powell M., Johns N., Green A. (2011). Social Justice in Social Policy. -- www.social-policy.org.uk/lincoln2011/PowellJohnsGreen%20P7.pdf.
Citazione non strutturata
Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Rice D. (2012). Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State: toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation.
Administration & Society, 45(9): 1038-1062.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712451895
Citazione non strutturata
Richards L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: SAGE.
Citazione non strutturata
Riessman C.K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: SAGE.
Citazione non strutturata
Rummery C., Glendinning C. (2000). Access to services as a civil and social rights issue: The role of welfare professionals
in regulating access to and commissioning services for disabled and older people under New Labour. Social Policy and Administration,
34(5): 529-550.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00209
Citazione non strutturata
Saruis T. (2015). Gli operatori sociali nel nuovo welfare. Roma: Carocci.
Citazione non strutturata
van Oorschot W. (2000). Who Should Get What, and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among
the Public. Policy and Politics, 28 (1): 33-49.
https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500811
Citazione non strutturata
Watkins-Hayes C. (2011). Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies. Journal
of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21: 233-251.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096
Citazione non strutturata
Weber M. (1958). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner’s.
Citazione non strutturata
Wenger E. (2000). Comunità di pratica e sistemi sociali di apprendimento. Studi organizzativi, 1: 11-33.
Citazione non strutturata
Wilkins V.M., Wenger J.F. (2015). Street-level bureaucrats and client interaction in a just world. In: Hupe P., Hill M., Buffat A., eds., Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Citazione non strutturata
Woolsey L.K. (1986). The Critical Incident Technique: An Innovative Qualitative Method of Research. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 20 (4): 242-254.